When it comes to implementing a manufacturing execution system (MES), the promise of low-code/no-code solutions has undeniable appeal.
Empowering citizen developers—end users without coding expertise—to build, implement, and maintain their own MES solutions is compelling. It promises agility, autonomy, and cost control. Low-code/no-code solutions hint at a future where anyone can create complex workflows and custom dashboards without needing to call in a developer or a systems integrator (SI).
As the industry continues to focus on democratizing technology, it’s easy to see why this vision has gained traction. But, like any scenario that sounds a little too good to be true—the reality is nuanced. Implementing and mastering low-code/no-code solutions requires balancing aspiration and operational truth.
Table of Contents
The Allure of Low-Code/No-Code Solutions
At first glance, low-code/no-code solutions seem tailor-made for today’s manufacturing challenges. Businesses want greater control over their digital transformation journeys. They want to solve site-specific problems quickly, without being locked into expensive vendor relationships. And they‘re looking to move faster than traditional development cycles typically allow.
On paper, low-code/no-code MES platforms check all the boxes. They offer the ability to:
- Develop custom dashboards in a fraction of the time
- Create flexible, site-specific workflows
- Tackle small projects without heavy IT involvement
For manufacturers who struggle with resource constraints or are eager to foster greater ownership at the plant level, this vision of empowerment is incredibly enticing. However, the power of low-code/no-code depends on how it’s used and how the surrounding infrastructure supports it.
The Reality of MES Complexity
It’s clear that low-code/no-code MES options can accelerate some tasks, but they don’t eliminate all the complexities of implementation and maintenance.
MES—a software that occupies the Level 3+ of the ISA-95 model—is inherently complex. It involves much more than assembling user interfaces or linking data fields.
As Parsec Enterprise Sales Executive Fraser Thomson recently said, “low-code/no-code appeals to a future vision: a world where manufacturers independently solve their own digital challenges. It’s an inspiring goal, but it tends to overlook the messy realities of manufacturing systems.”
Such realities include:
- Governance Requirements: MES environments must be governed to ensure compliance, data accuracy, and maintain alignment with broader enterprise goals. Governance can’t be “coded” into existence through a low-code interface; it must be designed into the system architecture and operational culture.
- Integration Complexity: MES platforms rarely exist in isolation. They typically integrate with ERP systems, SCADA layers, IoT devices, and/or quality management tools. Deep technical knowledge is required to manage both compatibility and data integrity.
- Skill Gaps: Even with intuitive low-code interfaces, understanding the nuances of manufacturing processes—and translating them into functional, compliant workflows—requires domain expertise.
- Ongoing Maintenance: Systems evolve. Regulatory requirements shift. Operational priorities change. An MES must be continuously maintained, updated, and optimized, no matter how efficiently its initial interfaces are built.
How TrakSYS Fits In
Low-code/no-code platforms are great tools; they can be incredibly powerful when applied appropriately. Where they can go wrong is in how they are often marketed—a full-stack replacement for traditional MES design and deployment methodologies.
In reality, low-code/no-code tools are best used to empower site-level innovation within a structured framework. They excel at solving localized problems, like building a quick KPI dashboard, crafting a shift-specific query, or customizing a report for a production line. But low-code/no-code solutions are not always a substitute for the architecture, planning, and expertise needed to deliver a resilient, scalable, and compliant MES.
Educating the market is critical. Manufacturers should understand three fundamental truths:
- Low-code/no-code is a tool, not a strategy. It can simplify application development but doesn’t replace the need for thoughtful system design, robust governance structures, or deep domain expertise.
- MES implementation requires collaboration. Whether you’re working with a trusted software provider or an experienced SI, building an enterprise-ready MES requires partnership, planning, and technical skills.
- Long-term success requires balance. Empowering plant-level creativity is important, but it must be balanced with top-down architectural standards and governance to ensure long-term success.
Conclusion
In today’s MES market, low-code/no-code tools tell a powerful marketing story—one of easy, simple implementation that can be executed by anyone, particularly non-technical team members. However, these solutions still require planning, collaboration, and governance to be successfully implemented.
Low-code/no-code is an essential aspect of democratizing MES solutions. It can make innovation faster, easier, and more accessible. But low-code/no-code solutions are not a shortcut; they’re an accelerator that works best when paired with structure, strategy, and experience.
At Parsec, we believe manufacturers deserve both empowerment and reliability. Through TrakSYS, we’re helping teams achieve exactly that—balancing innovation with stability to deliver true digital transformation.
FAQ
What’s the difference between low-code and no-code in manufacturing software?
Low-code platforms allow users to build applications with minimal hard-coding, usually through visual interfaces and reusable components. No-code platforms take it a step further, enabling users with no coding experience to build simple apps using drag-and-drop tools. In MES environments, these approaches are typically used to create dashboards, reports, or basic workflows.
Can a manufacturer fully implement an MES using only low-code or no-code tools?
While low-code/no-code tools can help accelerate certain tasks, implementing a full-scale MES requires planning, integration expertise, and ongoing governance. These tools are best used to support site-level customization, not replace the foundational system design.
What are the risks of relying too heavily on low-code/no-code in MES environments?
Over-reliance can lead to fragmented processes, inconsistent data, and a lack of oversight. Without proper governance, low-code/no-code implementations may introduce compliance risks or technical debt, especially in regulated industries or multi-site operations.
How does TrakSYS support low-code/no-code development responsibly?
TrakSYS offers low-code functionality that empowers teams to build useful dashboards and workflows quickly, while still maintaining system integrity, integration standards, and enterprise-wide governance. It strikes the right balance between flexibility and control.